Wednesday, 12 March 2014
A Day in the Life of a Psychotic Cat
Every morning, at precisely 9:42, Rhudolf is awoken by an angry clash of aggressive rapping, mingled with the heavy odour of cigarette smoke wafting over his pillow. This morning his right eye popped open first, as usual. Rhudolf paused, looked straight up at the circling blades above him, and pounced. The shrill war cry he emitted sent his owner storming in and without hesitation he turned his focus on her. Dark, greasy hair lay limp on her brow, and satanic tatoos were imprinted, forever clawing their way up her pock-marked arms. Rhudolf narrowed his eyes; crust crackled along the creases of his eyes as he narrowed in on his target. Blood-shoot eyes met blood shot eyes and a flash of fear seamed to flicker in the human pair. And then it was gone, and only contempt remained. Cracked lips drew back over fuzzy, yellowing teeth. "Stupid cat" the woman spat, leering at Rhudolf. But Rhudolf already had his nose pressed up hard against the cold glass of the window, his eyes manically darting back and forth-scanning the empty concrete lot for any sign of the infamous dog.
Monday, 10 March 2014
New Shoots Submission
Curtains
Sesquipedalian
chemicals dripped into her veins; the drugs seeping into every inch of soft
tissue. An empty box of Lucky Strike's were crushed on the clean plastic floor,
lying next to an out-dated purse while air forced it's way through cracked
lips, getting caught in thick bubbles of congealed mucous as it wisped its way
out from blackened lungs.
Term 2 Free Assignment
Term 2 Project
The Influence of Progress on Art and
Sciences, Comparatively
Science is, by nature, a progressive field -
something that builds from the pre-existing and proves itself either right or
wrong as time carries on. In contrast, both Art and Literature, while often
inspired by the works of the past, are fields that capture "the human
soul" (William Long), and exist not to provide information, but to appeal
to the artistic nature of man. In this way, Art and Literature are both
articles that can never be proved "wrong", and are therefore not
associated with progress in the same way that Science is. This is shown in the
way Art and Literature of the past are treated in the modern, as well as in the
definition of Literature given by William Long in his textbook “English
Literature: Its History and Its Significance for the Life of the
English-Speaking World”.
Because scientific hypotheses and
predictions change with the information available, Science is something that is
continually evolving as more and more information becomes accessible.
Comparatively, the innate nature of being human is something that never
changes, and thus Art and Literature do not progress in the sense of
improvement, but instead change only in terms of contextual
approach. Individuals today and individuals thousands of years ago have
the same inner workings, and it is for this reason that the Art and Literature
of centuries ago still resonate with people today. This understanding of
Literature and it’s characteristics is expressed by Long in three points; “The
first significant thing is the essentially artistic quality of all literature”,
the second “is its suggestiveness, its appeal to our emotions and imagination
rather than to our intellect”, and the third, “arising directly from the other two,
is its permanence”. If
we choose to accept these beliefs as truths, we can conclude that Literature is
a field untouched by the concept of progress. This view of Art and Literature
is clearly expressed in the way we approach Literature today..
Even long after their creators have left us, we
continue to study the musings of Shakespeare and marvel at the work of Da
Vinci. The Bible, for example, something produced hundreds of years ago,
contains sentiments that remain heavily prevalent in the way we conduct
ourselves, and even play a role in global politics. That being said, the
scientific aspect of the Bible is something that holds much less credibility
today than it would have at the time of its creation; it has been
scientifically proven that the world was not created in 7 days, Earth is not
flat, and dinosaurs and humans did not co-exist. Despite its inaccurate nature in
terms of scientific realities, however, the artistic and literary aspect of The
Bible is still widely accepted as an appropriate guide on how best to go about
life. This shows the relative longevity of Art and Literature in relation to
the considerably more tentative nature of scientific exploration. Science is,
by nature, a progressive field - something that builds from the pre-existing
and proves itself either right or wrong as time carries on. In contrast, both
Art and Literature, while often inspired by the works of the past, are fields
that capture "the human soul" (William Long), and exist to appeal to
the artistic nature of man, rather than simply the predictions and hypotheses
of an individual, Art and Literature are both fields that can withstand the
test of time, unlike many scientific studies and hypotheses. Children and people
today around the world are still encouraged to "treat others the way you
would have them treat you" and "[Bible quote]"; sentiments
directly from the Bible.
Art is something that occurs as a
result of the nature of the human condition; it is “the expression of life in
forms of truth and beauty” (Long). This depiction of Art and Literature as
statements of truth, rather than as a collection of hypotheses, as Science is
largely made up of, allows us to determine that progress is not associated with
Art and Literature in the same way that it is associated with Science.
Citations:
Long,
William. English Literature: Its History and Its Significance for the Life of the
English-Speaking World. Project Gutenburg EBook. January 6, 2004.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)